We will discuss with supporters outcome of talks held with government: Bajrang Punia ahead of 'Panchayat' in Sonipat
Gujarat Anti-terrorist Squad arrests 4 persons, with links to international terror body, from Porbandar
"These kinds of hasty decisions are not appreciated," says Ashwath Narayan on removing RSS founder Hedgewar from Class 10 book
West Bengal: Adhir Ranjan Chaudhary urges Governor to arrange Central forces for Panchayat elections
Kerala HC expunges sexually provocative dress remark by sessions court in Civic Chandran case
Kochi: Kerala High Court expunged the 'Sexually Provocative Dress' remark made by the Kozhikode Sessions Court while granting anticipatory bail to writer Civic Chandran.
High Court also upheld the decision of the sessions court granting anticipatory bail to Civic Chandran. The bench of S Krishnakumar in the Kozhikode Sessions Court, passed the controversial order on August 12, as it had observations to the effect that sexual harassment complaints would not stand if the woman were wearing a "sexually provocative dress".
The court observed this while granting anticipatory bail to writer and social activist Civic Chandran in a case of sexual harassment.
The Kerala government has approached the High Court challenging the anticipatory bail granted to the author and social activist Civic Chandran in the sexual harassment case filed by a Dalit writer.
The anticipatory bail created controversy after the Kozhikode Sessions Court made observations that sexual harassment complaints will not stand if the woman was wearing a 'sexually provocative dress'.
The state government has submitted the petition under Sections 482 and 439(2) of the CrPC and alleged that the findings and reasoning given by the Sessions Court in the anticipatory bail are suffering from illegality, lack of sensitivity, sobriety and perversity.
The government has contended in the petition that, "The conclusion drawn by the Kozhikode Sessions Court amounts to an infringement of the personal liberty of the victim and a violation of the right to life guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution."
"The findings of the Court are, per se, illegal, unjust and potentially expose the survivor to secondary trauma. The Supreme Court decision about the dress, behaviours or past 'conduct' or 'moral' of the Prosecutrix should not enter the verdict while granting bail. The Sessions Court flouted all the guidelines issued by the Supreme Court and granted pre-arrest bail to the accused by making observations which the Supreme Court deprecated," the petition said.
The Sessions Court granted Civic Chandran anticipatory bail on August 12 in the sexual harassment case. (ANI)